Licca Liber - The Lech river from barrage 23 to the outlet Augsburg: Section 4

    Solution ID
    Description of solution
    Summary (Challenges; Objectives)

    As in section 3 of the Licca Liber project, a dynamic self-development of the Lech is also conceivable in section 4. This should take place either on the west or east bank. The respective other bank section will be designed close to nature. Below the crash structure at river kilometre 50.4 the deepening of the river Lech is the greatest. Therefore, at this point sole-supporting measures such as a rough ramp are necessary to raise the river bed to the 1999 level (before the flood). The handling of the fall structure at river kilometre 50.4 remains uncertain until the detailed planning. How the slope can be overcome depends to a large extent on how much of the slope can be removed upstream and how much of the bed can be raised downstream. The use of hydroelectric power must be examined after the detailed planning has been completed. In order to minimize the risk of structural damage due to low groundwater levels in Kissing, the Auensee was not included. The Gießer overflow is to be connected to the Lech river to link the city forest streams. This will be done taking into account the functionality and safety for the wells near the river for the water supply of the city of Augsburg. The connection can therefore not be subject to any dynamic development. The measures are part of the project Licca Liber.

    Limiting factors / lessons learnt

    Proximity to Augsburg and drinking water production.

    Location Latitude
    48.3194000000
    Location Longitude
    10.9482000000
    Comment on location

    River kilometre 50,4

    Keywords
    Ecosystem (s) impacted
    Riverfront
    Hazard(s) concerned
    Erosion
    Other challenges
    Biodiversity
    Exposition
    Exposed assets
    Urban settings
    Is there population exposed?
    Yes, high density of population (>200 persons/km2)
    Activity
    Are there jobs created in the nature-based sector?
    Don't know
    Are there new employments in tourism sector, sport activities or recreational activites ?
    Don't know
    Are there new activities in the tourism sector , sport activities or recreational activites?
    Don't know
    Are there new/traditional activities that increased?
    I don't know
    International classification
    Sustainable development goals addressed
    SDG6 – Clean Water and Sanitation
    Sendai Frameword priorities addressed
    Priority 3. Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience
    Actors
    Organizations involved in the implementation of the action

    Free State of Bavaria, Municipality Augsburg, water authority Donauwörth

    Temporal aspects
    Design life time of the action
    More than 10 years
    Implementation time of the action
    Don’t know
    Others
    Participatory process
    Yes
    Is it possible to transpose this action in a different context?
    Yes, but difficult to transpose
    Risk reduction
    Hazard
    +
    Exposure
    +
    Vulnerability
    +
    Feasibility
    Technical Feasibility
    +/-
    Economic Feasibility
    +/-
    Environment
    Water
    +
    Soil
    +
    Vegetation
    +
    Landscape
    0
    Biodiversity
    +
    Society
    Quality of Life
    ?
    Community involvement
    ?
    Landscape Heritage
    ?
    Economy
    Revitalization
    ?
    Local Economy
    ?