Licca Liber - The Lech river from barrage 23 to the outlet Augsburg: Section 3

    Solution ID
    Description of solution
    Summary (Challenges; Objectives)

    Due to the close proximity to the community of Kissing on the eastern side of the Lech river and the wells to Drinking water production on the west, the developmental possibilities in this section of the Lech are limited. Therefore, necessary measures for the nature-compatible protection of the river bed (e.g. rough ramps) should be bundled here. The aim is to create the conditions for a free development in sections 1 and 2. A design of the river bed as close to nature as possible is aimed for in this section by widening on the eastern side. This will make the Lech riverbank accessible to the population. If the river bed support measures allow it, there is also the option of allowing the Lech to develop at its own pace in this section. It is to be examined on both the eastern and western banks. On the west side this would be connected with the installation of drinking water wells.The measures are part of the project Licca Liber.

    Limiting factors / lessons learnt

    Close proximity to the community Kissing and to drinking water production. 

    Location Latitude
    48.3045000000
    Location Longitude
    10.9532000000
    Comment on location

    Kissing

    Keywords
    Ecosystem (s) impacted
    Riverfront
    Hazard(s) concerned
    Erosion
    Other challenges
    Biodiversity
    Exposition
    Exposed assets
    Urban settings
    Is there population exposed?
    Yes, high density of population (>200 persons/km2)
    Activity
    Are there jobs created in the nature-based sector?
    Don't know
    Are there new employments in tourism sector, sport activities or recreational activites ?
    Don't know
    Are there new activities in the tourism sector , sport activities or recreational activites?
    Don't know
    Are there new/traditional activities that increased?
    I don't know
    Please specify
    Recreational use
    International classification
    Sustainable development goals addressed
    SDG6 – Clean Water and Sanitation
    Sendai Frameword priorities addressed
    Priority 3. Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience
    Actors
    Organizations involved in the implementation of the action

    Free State of Bavaria, Municipality Augsburg, water authority Donauwörth

    Temporal aspects
    Design life time of the action
    More than 10 years
    Implementation time of the action
    Don’t know
    Others
    Participatory process
    Yes
    Is it possible to transpose this action in a different context?
    Yes, but difficult to transpose
    Risk reduction
    Hazard
    +
    Exposure
    +
    Vulnerability
    +
    Feasibility
    Technical Feasibility
    +/-
    Economic Feasibility
    +/-
    Environment
    Water
    0
    Soil
    0
    Vegetation
    +
    Landscape
    +
    Biodiversity
    +
    Society
    Quality of Life
    +
    Community involvement
    +
    Landscape Heritage
    0
    Economy
    Revitalization
    ?
    Local Economy
    ?